walked to my classroom, said hello and started talking.
What am I talking about? That's always a good question. People, including me, ask it all the time. Today, I was talking about making sense of a college course called Culture and Gastronomy. Here's an excerpt from my lecture notes:
so let’s get back to Gastronomy and Culture- i’m intimidated by the words myself. one word sounds pretty pompous, the other has so many meanings that we can slip among them without noticing that we’ve changed what we’re talking abt.
And yes, I have to admit that I'm slipping around here myself. I decided to focus on what they're calling Modernist Cuisine because I've wondered for a long time how Modernism: The Trend affected Modernism: The Fashion in Food. In fact, I've wondered for years about food's position as a weird outlier in the world of Fashion. We can go naked, but we can't go hungry and food swings-or does it rotate?-in long arcs of High Fashion and Low. The rise and fall, I mean the Rise and Fall of the Tastykake completely underlapping the Rise and Fall of Cuisine Minceur. Can this mean anything? Is it just trivial or is something hiding?
I want to know just because I want to. It's not necessary to me, I can love the food I cook and the food I eat and it doesn't have to mean anything. I can be happy that it makes me and us happy, that we camp on the side of the angels when we cook beautifully and eat well.
But now, I've got to put up or shut up.
There are nine students at one of the best culinary schools in the country sitting in front of me with notebooks open. I know a lot of stuff, but do I know what I'm talking about? The only way I'm going to find out is to start talking and see what comes out of my mouth. Is this fair to them? Well, I've had a lot of courses where the professor put out all she knew and didn't even take a crack at the big questions. Some of those courses were the best ones of my life, but I'm aiming for something better. After all, this is a comeback and there ought to be something good to comeback to.
Francis O'Laughlin at Hobart College-say the name and tremble before you walk in a classroom, boy.
At least, I should know what the terms mean. Here's what my notes have for 'Modern':
Modern means
•a significant break with the past.founded on
•new or newly diffused knowledge and/or
•new moral perspective
I'm sure someone has this better, but it's what I'm working with today. It's a backwards definition, one I built by starting with what I know about Modern Cooking and going backwards. Fair enough.
Then there's Culture. I've got my anthropants down around my knees here. I remember pages of 'definitions' and seminars of circular discussions. "What's Culture?" "It's X and Y and Z" "Okay, but what about B and R?" "Oh yeah, that too." So I know the important thing with a definition here is the -fini- part. You gotta stop somewhere. I stop like this:
Culture is Human Nature as processed by humans. Cathedrals and cartwheels, ways of talking and the grammar of walkingLet’s assume that a person can participate in more than one culture and that cultures can be large and inclusive (Han Chinese)
or small and particular (Bolivian soccer fans).
Let’s allow that culture is usually passed from parents to children, but that transmission isn’t perfect. we have whisper-down-the-lane rather than digital duplication. Because of that cultures change. they change because of duplication drift (you ain’t your daddy) and also because cultures meet when peoples meet.
Sometimes when cultures meet, you get a mash-up: characteristics thrown together like in red-bean ice-cream. Sometimes (more often) you get genuinely new products: spaghetti and meatballs. The term for this is Syncretism (note slightly different use in philosophy.)
Then worst of all is Gastronomy
All of this brings us to our working definition of Gastronomy:
THE FOOD THAT MOM WOULD HAVE MADE IF SHE HAD HAD THE TIME, MONEY, ENERGY, INFORMATION AND COMMUNITY SUPPORT TO DO SO.
Let’s take a minute with that ‘IF’. If there isn’t enough food to go around, or if there’s only a few kinds of food, then there’s no Gastronomy. G depends on abundance and variety. without abundance, there's no creative struggle, there's just struggle. that’s the
•first characteristic of Gastronomy
• second: there is a value attached to food beyond nutrition
•third: that value itself can be the subject of discussion. two types
aesthetic
Social
fourth: Gastronomy is about processed food, food that we have transformed. this is key.
So I go on from there: Culture is Cooking, ya see. Why do we cook at all? Who are we anyway? Claude, Levi and Strauss. Do I know what I'm talking about? Well, yeah, I've spent a lot of time with this stuff. Is my knowing about it going to take these students someplace new?
As we say in Cancerland: Stay tuned.
Right there in the front row, Smith, Baptiste have their notebooks open. Nyheim and McFadden are all ears. Gotta get it right.
Right there in the front row, Smith, Baptiste have their notebooks open. Nyheim and McFadden are all ears. Gotta get it right.

